The module map
| Block | Approx. questions | Question types | Target per question | Block time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craft and Structure | 1–7 | Words in Context, Text Structure and Purpose, Cross-Text Connections | 45–60 s (Words in Context); 60–90 s (others) | about 8 min |
| Information and Ideas | 8–14 | Central Ideas and Details, Command of Evidence, Inferences | 75–100 s | about 11 min |
| Standard English Conventions | 15–21 | Boundaries; Form, Structure, and Sense | 30–45 s | about 5 min |
| Expression of Ideas | 22–27 | Transitions, Rhetorical Synthesis | 30–50 s | about 4 min |
Block sizes vary by a question or two. Outside Conventions, questions are grouped by skill, and each skill group runs from easier to harder. Conventions runs from easier to harder across the whole block. So the hardest items sit at the end of each skill group, not only at the end of the module.
The 32-minute pacing plan
| Checkpoint | Time remaining on the clock |
|---|---|
| Start | 32:00 |
| Craft and Structure finished | 24:00 or more |
| Information and Ideas finished | 13:00 or more |
| Conventions finished | 8:00 or more |
| Expression of Ideas finished | 4:00 or more: review flagged questions |
- Two-minute cap. If a question passes 2 minutes, eliminate what you can, choose, flag and move on.
- Bank time from rules. Conventions and Transitions should take 30–45 seconds each. Spend that surplus on Inferences and hard Words in Context.
- Review in order of closeness. Revisit the flagged questions where you were down to two choices first.
Method by question type
1. Words in Context
Cover the choices. Find the clue (contrast, restatement, cause and effect, or an example), and predict the missing word in your own words. Then match your prediction for meaning, intensity and connotation. Trap: a word linked to the topic that doesn’t fit the sentence’s logic, or the right idea at the wrong strength (refuted where the text only questioned).
2. Text Structure and Purpose
Say the purpose of the whole text in about five words, starting with a verb: argue, explain, contrast, challenge, describe. For an underlined sentence (shown in bold in Courselo practice), ask what the text would lose without it: evidence, a counterpoint, a qualification or a conclusion. Trap: a choice that describes the content accurately but gets its function wrong, or an overstated stance (criticizes when the author merely notes).
3. Cross-Text Connections
Write a one-line summary of each text’s claim. Name the relationship (agrees, rejects, qualifies, or extends) before you read the choices. For “how would the author of Text 2 respond,” find the specific point in Text 2 that addresses Text 1’s claim. Trap: exaggerating the disagreement, or giving one author’s view to the other. Budget about 90 seconds.
4. Central Ideas and Details
The main idea is the claim the other sentences support. In literary passages, track what the character feels or what changes. Reread short poems rather than guess. Trap: choices that are too narrow (one detail), too broad (beyond the text) or a slight distortion of a detail.
5. Command of Evidence (textual and quantitative)
Textual: break the claim into parts. For example, “the narrator admires the city but finds it isolating” has two parts, and the right quotation shows both. For “support the hypothesis” questions, the right finding connects to the specific variable or mechanism in the hypothesis. Quantitative: read the sentence you must complete first. Then read the title, axes, units and legend. First eliminate choices that are false to the graphic. Then eliminate choices that are true to the graphic but don’t support this claim. Trap: evidence that is on topic but proves only half the claim, or data from the wrong group or year.
6. Inferences
The blank is the conclusion of a short argument. Reduce the premises to a chain (“A happens only when B; B was absent; so ...”). Choose the conclusion that must follow, not one that merely could. Hard module 2 inferences may deserve up to 2 minutes. Trap: a plausible real-world claim that goes beyond the text, reversed cause and effect, or an absolute word (all, never, proves) the text can’t support.
7. Boundaries
Glance at the choices to see which rule is being tested. Then check whether there is a complete independent clause on each side of the punctuation.
| Joining | Correct options |
|---|---|
| Two independent clauses | period; semicolon; comma + and/but/so (FANBOYS); colon or dash if the second clause explains the first |
| Clause + list or explanation | colon or dash after a complete clause |
| Supplementary element | a matching pair: two commas, two dashes or two parentheses |
| Subject–verb, verb–object, title + name | no punctuation |
Trap: a comma splice, or a comma before however joining two clauses (it needs a semicolon or period). So are mismatched pairs, such as a dash that opens and a comma that closes.
8. Form, Structure, and Sense
Find the true subject by crossing out prepositional phrases and modifiers, then match the verb or pronoun to it. Check that the sentence has a finite main verb, that the tense fits the timeline, that an introductory modifier is followed by the noun it describes, and whether the noun should be plural or possessive. Trap: agreeing with the nearest noun (“the collection of rare maps was”) or choosing an -ing form that leaves a fragment.
9. Transitions
Cover the blank and read the sentence before and after it. Label the relationship: contrast, concession, same direction, cause and effect, example, sequence or emphasis. Then pick the transition that expresses exactly that relationship. Know the near-misses: however (contrast) vs nevertheless (despite that) vs instead (replacement), and thus (result) vs for example (illustration). Trap: choosing a transition by its tone rather than the logic, or in addition where the second sentence is a result.
10. Rhetorical Synthesis
Read the goal in the question first. The notes are all true, so accuracy never decides the answer; only the goal does. Test each choice against the goal. “Emphasize a difference” needs both items plus a contrast. “Introduce the study to an unfamiliar audience” needs context about who or what. “Present the conclusion” needs the finding, not the method. Trap: an accurate sentence that serves a different goal, or one that includes only one of two required elements. Budget 30–50 seconds.
Score bands for Reading and Writing
| Section score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 780–800 | 0–2 misses on the harder route. Conventions perfect; hard vocabulary and inferences almost always right. |
| 730–770 | 2–6 misses, usually hard Words in Context, Cross-Text or Inferences at the ends of skill groups. |
| 680–720 | Solid on rules and medium reading. Loses 7–11 to scope errors and vocabulary gaps. |
| 600–670 | Reaches the harder route inconsistently. Several Conventions rules not yet automatic. |
| Below 600 | Rules and predicting before reading the choices not yet in place. Start with Conventions and Transitions for the fastest gains. |
Section-wide traps
Quick recap
- The order is fixed: Craft and Structure → Information and Ideas → Conventions → Expression of Ideas.
- Checkpoints: 24:00, 13:00, 8:00 and 4:00 remaining, with a 2-minute cap on any question.
- Predict before reading choices, split claims into parts, and choose what the text requires.
- Conventions and Transitions are rule-based: aim for 100% at 30–45 seconds each.